In a significant legal development on Friday, July 4, 2025, the Madras High Court directed the Greater Chennai City Police to duly consider a representation from the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), an organization led by actor Vijay, regarding permission for a demonstration condemning custodial deaths in Tamil Nadu. This move follows a petition filed by TVK, represented by its Deputy General Secretary, C.T.R. Nirmal Kumar.

Court’s Directive for Police Consideration

The Madras High Court, presided over by Justice P. Velmurugan, directed the Chennai City Police to review TVK’s representation regarding the proposed demonstration. The demonstration was intended to highlight the increasing number of custodial deaths in Tamil Nadu, which TVK claims have occurred since the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party came to power in 2021. TVK, in its petition, claimed that 23 custodial deaths have been reported across the state during this period, prompting the need for public condemnation.

The court’s order came after TVK’s counsel, P. Vijendran, informed the court that the party had submitted a formal request to the Chennai police on July 1, seeking permission for the demonstration. The proposed demonstration was to be held at Sivananda Salai between 10 am and 1 pm on July 6, 2025, a Sunday. However, the Chennai police had raised objections regarding the proposed venue. Despite the party’s attempts to suggest an alternative location, those requests were also rejected by the police.

Disagreement Over Venue and Timing

The police’s refusal to grant permission for the originally proposed venue and the alternative venue prompted TVK to approach the court. The police raised concerns over the timing and location of the demonstration, asking for further clarifications, but TVK had not responded to these queries by the time of the court hearing.

In the court, Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran pointed out that the police had requested additional clarifications on July 3, but the petitioner did not provide the required response in time. The police’s concerns primarily revolved around the venue and timing of the protest, which TVK was adamant about moving forward with.

Justice Velmurugan’s Observations

After hearing the arguments from both parties, Justice P. Velmurugan observed that the police must be given a reasonable amount of time to review such requests. The judge noted that TVK’s request for a demonstration on July 6, just five days after the representation was made, was not feasible without allowing enough time for proper consideration by the police. He emphasized that a minimum of 15 days’ time should be given to the police to review the request and make an informed decision.

Therefore, the judge disposed of TVK’s petition with an instruction to the party to submit a fresh representation to the Chennai police. The new request should seek permission for the demonstration on an alternate day, giving the authorities the time needed to evaluate the application properly. Justice Velmurugan directed the police to duly consider the updated representation and issue appropriate orders accordingly.

Background on Custodial Deaths in Tamil Nadu

TVK’s protest is rooted in a growing concern over the rise in custodial deaths in Tamil Nadu. The party alleges that since the DMK assumed power in 2021, at least 23 custodial deaths have occurred in the state, which they claim are a result of police brutality and human rights violations. These incidents have sparked outrage, especially in light of the public’s ongoing demand for accountability and reforms in the police system.

Custodial deaths have long been a controversial issue in India, with human rights organizations and activists consistently calling for better oversight and accountability within law enforcement agencies. Protests like the one planned by TVK aim to raise awareness about these issues and push for stronger measures to prevent such deaths and ensure justice for victims and their families.

Legal Implications of Demonstrations and Public Protests

Under Indian law, any public demonstration or protest requires prior permission from local authorities, particularly the police, to ensure that law and order is maintained. This procedure is meant to prevent disruptions and ensure the safety of participants and the general public.

In this case, TVK’s right to demonstrate is protected by the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression. However, the police are obligated to evaluate the implications of the proposed protest on public order, safety, and the potential for violence. This is why the police raised concerns over the timing and location of the demonstration.

The Role of TVK and Actor Vijay in the Protest

TVK, led by popular actor Vijay, has a significant following in Tamil Nadu. The actor’s influence in the state has often played a central role in driving social and political movements. His involvement in TVK’s efforts to highlight issues such as custodial deaths only adds weight to the cause.

Vijay’s political leanings have attracted attention over the years, and his leadership in the TVK party has often rallied people around causes related to justice, equality, and human rights. The party’s decision to condemn custodial deaths and take legal action reflects its broader stance on advocating for the rights of marginalized communities and pressing for police reforms in the state.

Police Response and Government’s Approach to Protest Regulation

While the police have legitimate concerns regarding the potential disruptions that large public gatherings could cause, the issue also raises questions about the state government’s approach to public protests. The balancing act between ensuring public order and allowing citizens to exercise their democratic rights remains a key issue in maintaining harmony and trust between law enforcement and the public.

The Tamil Nadu government has previously been involved in addressing custodial deaths and has faced criticism for not doing enough to tackle police brutality. This demonstration and the court’s involvement highlight the increasing public demand for reforms in the law enforcement system.

Future of Protests and Political Movements in Tamil Nadu

Given the high-profile nature of the planned demonstration, it is clear that the issue of custodial deaths will continue to be a major point of contention in Tamil Nadu. TVK’s demonstration, once approved, is expected to gain considerable media attention and public support, potentially leading to further political movements advocating for justice and police accountability.

This case also marks a significant moment for Tamil Nadu’s political landscape, as public protests led by influential leaders like Vijay could potentially reshape the discourse around police reform and human rights. The resolution of this matter in the courts and with local authorities will likely have a lasting impact on the way future demonstrations are handled by the police in Tamil Nadu.

The Madras High Court’s decision to direct the Greater Chennai Police to consider TVK’s request for a demonstration reflects the ongoing struggle for justice in Tamil Nadu. While the immediate future of the protest hinges on the police’s final decision, the broader issue of custodial deaths in the state remains a critical topic that needs urgent attention. The court’s intervention serves as a reminder of the importance of due process, while also highlighting the necessity for government action to address human rights violations and ensure police accountability.

As Tamil Nadu continues to grapple with these issues, the outcome of this case could shape the future of public protests and the relationship between law enforcement and the public in the state.