The release of a film based on the life of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has landed in court. The filmmakers claim that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is deliberately delaying the certification process. The Bombay High Court has now stepped in, stating that the judges will watch the film before passing any order.

Title and Background of the Film

The film in question is titled Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi. Produced by Samrat Cinematics India Private Limited, the film is based on author Shantanu Gupta’s work The Monk Who Became Chief Minister. According to the producers, the film is not merely a political biography. Instead, they argue, it seeks to inspire youth by highlighting unity and integrity. Importantly, the office of CM Yogi Adityanath has not raised objections regarding the film. Despite this, the project has faced repeated hurdles from the certification board.

Filmmakers Move to Court

The petitioners informed the court that they first applied for certification on 5 June 2025. Under the Cinematograph Act, CBFC is required to scrutinize applications within seven days and arrange a screening within fifteen days. However, even after more than a month, there was no progress. The producers then reapplied under the “priority scheme.” CBFC fixed 7 July as the date for screening. Yet, that date was later canceled without explanation.

With no response, the filmmakers approached the Bombay High Court. They allege that CBFC has also delayed clearance for the film’s teaser, trailer, and promotional songs. The board has not provided reasons for the delay, forcing the producers to seek judicial intervention.

Arguments in Court

During hearings, the CBFC stated that it would decide on the application within two working days. The producers highlighted that the film’s initial release date was fixed for 1 August. Due to delays, the release schedule was disrupted.

On 21 July, CBFC informed the filmmakers that the application had been rejected. The producers once again approached the court. The court directed CBFC to specify what content was objectionable so that it could be addressed. CBFC had earlier raised 29 objections, of which eight were later dropped. The board also expressed concerns about the title of the film.

Producers Challenge CBFC Objections

The producers argued that the objections were excessive and vague. They maintained that the film does not glorify or defame any political leader but only narrates the personal journey of Yogi Adityanath. According to their petition, CBFC was acting beyond its mandate by delaying certification and obstructing the release. The producers also argued that CBFC’s actions infringed on their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution.

Court’s Observations

The Bombay High Court observed that CBFC had failed to follow the principles of natural justice. Judges stated that before issuing any order, they would personally view the film. This step would help the court understand whether CBFC’s objections were valid. The next hearing has been scheduled for 25 August 2025.

The court also noted that CBFC had the option to recommend modifications instead of outright delaying the process. It emphasized that creative freedom must be respected while ensuring that films do not violate legal or social norms.

The Producers’ Stand

Samrat Cinematics India maintained that the film aims to motivate the youth. Their petition stated that the story is not just about a political leader but about values of unity and integrity. The filmmakers also emphasized that CM Yogi Adityanath’s office had raised no concerns. They argued that the film’s message was consistent with cultural and social values and that unnecessary delays were unjustified.

CBFC’s Response

CBFC, on its part, argued that the writ petition was not maintainable. The board claimed that the filmmakers could have challenged the decision through the Revising Committee under the Cinematograph Act. However, the producers argued that the Revising Committee itself had acted in a manner that violated constitutional rights. The court acknowledged this argument and stressed that the process must remain fair and transparent.

Impact of Delays on Release

The film’s release has already been postponed due to certification issues. Originally scheduled for 1 August, the delay has disrupted marketing and distribution plans. Promotional activities, including teaser and trailer releases, have also been stalled. Producers say this has caused financial losses and reduced momentum for the project. The uncertainty has further frustrated the film’s cast, crew, and investors.

Public Interest and Sensitivity

Films based on political figures often generate controversy in India. The Yogi Adityanath biopic is particularly sensitive given his role as the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and his prominence in national politics. Critics argue that the film may influence public perception, while supporters believe it can inspire young audiences. The court’s decision will therefore be closely watched by political circles, filmmakers, and audiences alike.

The Larger Debate on Film Certification

This case once again raises questions about film certification in India. Filmmakers have often accused CBFC of arbitrary decisions and political bias. The balance between creative freedom and social responsibility remains contentious. The Bombay High Court’s decision in this case could set a precedent for future films based on political leaders. It also highlights the need for timely decisions to avoid unnecessary financial and creative disruption.

Looking Ahead

The next hearing on 25 August will be crucial. The judges are expected to watch the film and decide whether CBFC’s objections are justified. If cleared, the film could see a release soon after. However, if objections are upheld, further modifications may be required, delaying the release even more. The outcome will determine whether Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi reaches audiences in its intended form.

The controversy surrounding the Yogi Adityanath biopic reflects the complex intersection of politics, cinema, and law. While the filmmakers argue that CBFC is unjustly delaying certification, the board insists it is following procedure. The Bombay High Court has stepped in, promising to personally review the film before issuing any order. With over 5.65 lakh results of student schemes also making headlines in Bihar, the film’s case underscores the ongoing struggle between creative expression and regulatory authority. For now, the fate of Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi lies in the hands of the judiciary, with the next hearing scheduled for 25 August 2025.