KKN Gurugram Desk | The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, has ignited a significant political and social debate in India. AIMIM Chief Asaduddi n Owaisi has emerged as a central figure opposing the legislation, leading nationwide protests and voicing concerns over the potential implications for Muslim property rights and religious freedoms.

Understanding the Waqf Amendment Act 2025

The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, introduced substantial changes to the Waqf Act of 1995. Key provisions include:

• Redefinition of Waqf: Only properties owned by Muslims practicing Islam for at least five years can be declared as Waqf.

• Removal of ‘Waqf by User’: The provision allowing properties used by the Muslim community for religious purposes over time to be recognized as Waqf has been omitted.

• Inclusion of Non-Muslims in Waqf Boards: The Act allows for non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards, a move criticized for potentially undermining the religious autonomy of these boards.

• Empowerment of Government Officials: District collectors are now authorized to determine ownership of disputed Waqf properties, shifting authority from Waqf boards to government-appointed officials.

These changes have raised concerns about potential government overreach and the erosion of minority rights.

Asaduddin Owaisi’s Opposition

Asaduddin Owaisi has been at the forefront of the opposition to the Waqf Amendment Act. He argues that the Act is unconstitutional and targets Muslim identity. Owaisi has likened the protests against the Act to the farmers’ protests, emphasizing the need for sustained and peaceful demonstrations until the law is repealed.

In a public meeting organized by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), Owaisi stated, “You (PM Narendra Modi) will have to take back this law. The way our farmer brothers have shown the path, we will continue to agitate the same way. Until the law is withdrawn, there will be peaceful protest in the country.”

Nationwide Protests and Legal Challenges

The opposition to the Waqf Amendment Act has manifested in various forms across the country:

• Public Demonstrations: Protests have been organized in multiple cities, with participants expressing their dissent against the Act.

• Legal Petitions: Several petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Act have been filed in the Supreme Court. The Court has reserved its judgment on the matter.

• Political Support: Political parties like the Congress have pledged support to the AIMPLB’s protests, emphasizing the need to protect constitutional rights and minority interests.

Government’s Defense

The central government has defended the Waqf Amendment Act, asserting that it aims to bring transparency and accountability to the management of Waqf properties. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued in the Supreme Court that the requirement for individuals to be practicing Muslims for at least five years to dedicate properties as Waqf aligns with the stipulations of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.

The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, has become a focal point of contention in India’s socio-political landscape. While the government maintains that the Act is a step towards better governance of Waqf properties, critics argue that it infringes upon the rights of the Muslim community and undermines religious freedoms. As the Supreme Court deliberates on the matter, the nation watches closely, understanding that the outcome will have significant implications for minority rights and the secular fabric of the country.