Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta was recently attacked during a public hearing. The assailant, identified as Rajesh from Rajkot in Gujarat, is now under scrutiny. New revelations have surfaced about his past activities, especially his controversial stay in Ayodhya.
Reports indicate Rajesh had previously attempted to stage a hunger strike at the Ram Mandir premises. His demands centered around the protection of animals, which he described as “voiceless beings.” The discovery of his Ayodhya connection has reignited debates around his motives and background.
Rajesh, whose full name is Rajesh Bhai Khemji, belongs to Rajkot, Gujarat. He is not a known political figure but gained attention through his activism.
According to sources, Rajesh has been vocal about animal welfare issues. His methods of protest, however, have been dramatic, involving hunger strikes and direct confrontations with security forces. His activities before the attack on Delhi CM Rekha Gupta show a pattern of erratic activism.
On May 12, Rajesh attempted to stage a hunger strike at the Ram Mandir complex. He carried a placard highlighting demands for animal welfare. The message on his placard emphasized the need for protection of animals.
Rajesh reportedly wanted an animal hospital to be constructed inside the temple premises. He also demanded the establishment of a food distribution center for stray dogs and monkeys. His plan included structured welfare schemes for voiceless beings.
Rajesh was stopped by private security deployed at the Ram Mandir. Guards denied him entry into the premises when he tried to begin his hunger strike.
Eyewitnesses confirmed that Rajesh argued with security guards near the Darshan Marg area. The argument escalated, leading to his removal from the temple premises. He recorded a video soon after, accusing guards of misconduct.
In the video, Rajesh claimed he was insulted while demanding justice for animals. His video was shared widely and quickly gained attention on social media platforms.
After being denied entry, Rajesh vowed to continue his protest. He announced plans to sit on a hunger strike the next day, May 13, near the main entrance of the Ram Mandir.
The protest was to be staged outside Birla Dharamshala, close to the temple. His video statement outlined the same demands he made earlier, stressing animal care and welfare.
However, Ayodhya police intervened before matters escalated. Local officers convinced Rajesh to abandon the hunger strike. Authorities did not file a formal case against him at the time.
Rajesh outlined several demands related to animal welfare in Ayodhya:
Construction of a hospital inside Ram Mandir premises for injured animals.
Establishment of an Ann Kshetra for feeding stray dogs and monkeys.
Implementation of structured welfare policies for voiceless beings.
He argued that Ram Mandir, as a symbol of dharma, must take responsibility for animal protection. He refused to leave unless his concerns were addressed. Rajesh even asked for trustees of the Ram Mandir to meet him in person.
Authorities chose not to take legal action against Rajesh at that time. They viewed his demands as emotional rather than criminal.
Instead, police pacified him and sent him back, ending the potential standoff. This incident was previously reported in local news but gained renewed attention after his attack on CM Rekha Gupta.
The shocking attack took place on Wednesday during a public hearing session. CM Rekha Gupta was listening to grievances when Rajesh approached her. Without warning, he launched an attack.
Security personnel quickly restrained Rajesh and ensured the safety of the Chief Minister. The incident immediately brought his past activities under the spotlight. His earlier actions in Ayodhya became a key focus of investigation.
The attack has led experts to examine Rajesh’s behavioral patterns. His hunger strikes, confrontations, and public videos suggest a tendency toward extreme activism.
His demands about animal welfare resonated with many, but his methods often crossed limits. The Ayodhya incident revealed his persistence in seeking attention through unusual protests.
Now, after attacking a sitting Chief Minister, his activism has escalated into violence.
The Ayodhya protests are significant in understanding Rajesh’s mindset. Despite being removed by security, he made sure his message reached people through social media.
Videos of him accusing guards and narrating his demands showcased his determination. But these protests also reflected his frustration at not being heard.
Observers believe the Ram Mandir incident was a precursor to his aggressive behavior in Delhi.
The attack on CM Rekha Gupta has triggered widespread condemnation. Leaders from across parties demanded strict action against Rajesh.
Public discussions also highlighted his Ayodhya protests, questioning whether authorities overlooked early warning signs. Some argue that ignoring his activities in Ayodhya may have emboldened him further.
Animal rights activists, however, expressed mixed reactions. While they distanced themselves from his violent act, they acknowledged that his demands reflected genuine concerns for stray animals.
Despite the shocking incident, CM Rekha Gupta remained calm. She continued her public interaction after security ensured her safety.
Later, she remarked that violence cannot be tolerated in a democracy. She emphasized that people are free to protest, but attacks on elected representatives are unacceptable.
Her statement drew praise from political circles for showing composure in a tense situation.
Rajesh’s attack raises broader concerns about the nature of activism in India. While citizens have the right to protest, crossing into aggression undermines their cause.
Rajesh’s Ayodhya connection provides crucial insight into his radicalized methods. His focus on animal welfare was noble, but his inability to pursue it through lawful means brought him into conflict with authorities.
Delhi Police and intelligence agencies are now piecing together Rajesh’s background. His activities in Ayodhya, along with his movements in Gujarat, are under detailed review.
Officials are examining whether Rajesh acted alone or under influence from external groups. Early reports suggest he worked independently, motivated by personal ideology.
The Ayodhya connection of Rajesh, the attacker of CM Rekha Gupta, sheds new light on his motives. His earlier attempt to stage a hunger strike at Ram Mandir highlighted his passion for animal welfare.
But his transition from protester to assailant marks a dangerous shift. The incident underscores the need for balanced activism rooted in peaceful expression rather than violence.
Rajesh’s story serves as a reminder that causes, however noble, lose meaning when pursued through aggression. The attack on Delhi’s Chief Minister will likely remain a defining chapter in discussions about activism, security, and governance in India.
Weight gain has become one of the most common health concerns in modern times. Changing… Read More
Prayagraj has once again become the center of attention in Indian cinema. Actors Ayushman Khurrana,… Read More
India has achieved another landmark in space exploration with Group Captain Shubhashu Shukla’s successful journey… Read More
Shridharacharya Veda Gurukulam, operating under the guidance of Vishwamitra Sena, has become a living example… Read More
Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a special meeting with NDA leaders after the monsoon session… Read More
The Indian Army has invited applications for the 66th Short Service Commission (SSC) Technical Entry… Read More