In a fresh attack on the central government, Lalu Prasad Yadav, the former Chief Minister of Bihar and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader, raised several pointed questions regarding the Pahalgam terrorist attack that occurred two months ago, on April 22, 2025. The attack, which led to the deaths of several innocent civilians, has remained a topic of controversy, with the perpetrators still at large. Lalu Prasad Yadav used social media to express his concerns and demand answers from the Indian government and U.S. President Donald Trump.
Lalu Yadav Questions the Delay in Arresting Terrorists Responsible for Pahalgam Attack
Lalu Yadav, known for his sharp criticism of the ruling government, questioned the BJP-led central government’s failure to capture the terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack. He shared a photo on social media that depicted a critical viewpoint of both the Indian administration and U.S. President Donald Trump.
In his social media post, Yadav raised a fundamental question, “Why has the government not yet apprehended the terrorists who carried out the Pahalgam attack, killing innocent citizens of India?” His post pointed out the government’s apparent lack of urgency in bringing the criminals to justice. Yadav’s tweet implied that there has been no significant progress in the investigation, leading to increasing doubts about the efficiency of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and other relevant law enforcement bodies.
The Pahalgam attack took place in Jammu and Kashmir, where terrorists targeted tourists and locals, resulting in a significant loss of life. Two months after the attack, the Indian public and opposition leaders, like Lalu Yadav, have been demanding justice and accountability.
Lalu Prasad Yadav’s Critique of President Donald Trump
Adding fuel to the fire, Lalu Yadav also turned his focus towards Donald Trump, the President of the United States. Yadav questioned why India, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, decided to implement a ceasefire based on Trump’s request. He expressed his concerns about the Indian government’s subordination to foreign pressure, especially in matters that directly affect national security.
He rhetorically asked, “Why did India agree to a ceasefire on the advice of the U.S. President?” Lalu Prasad Yadav raised these concerns not only as an opposition leader but also as a patriotic citizen who believes that India’s sovereignty should be maintained without external interference. His comments sparked debate on social media, with many questioning whether such decisions were made to please international leaders at the cost of India’s national interests.
Lalu Yadav Shares Critical Image of Indian Political Leaders
As part of his social media campaign against the government, Lalu Yadav shared an animated image that visually criticized the relationship between the Indian leadership and Donald Trump. In the image, Donald Trump is shown seated comfortably in a chair, while Prime Minister Narendra Modi is depicted sitting on his lap. The image features key Indian political figures such as Amit Shah, Raj Nath Singh, and S. Jaishankar, with the caption “Lotus ka Aaka, POTUS” (which roughly translates to “Lotus’s Master, POTUS”).
The imagery, which uses humor and satire, implied that India’s leaders are subservient to Donald Trump, reflecting the ongoing criticism of the current administration’s foreign policy. The visual, coupled with Lalu’s questions, became viral on social media, sparking debates among supporters and critics alike.
The image of Modi on Trump’s lap symbolized Lalu Yadav’s belief that India’s sovereignty was being compromised in favor of foreign relations. The term POTUS (President of the United States) in the caption was used to emphasize the disproportionate influence of the U.S. on India’s decisions. It became a rallying cry for those who oppose the government’s handling of both national and international matters.
Impact on Political Discourse: A Larger Debate on Sovereignty and National Security
Lalu Yadav’s comments, which combine direct questioning of the Indian government’s security measures and its foreign policy stance, have intensified the political discourse in India. Opposition parties have been vocal about their concerns regarding the BJP’s handling of national security, especially after the Pahalgam attack.
The Pahalgam attack has become a symbol of the challenges facing India in terms of counterterrorism efforts, while also being a point of contention between nationalists and those questioning the government’s decisions. Critics of the ruling party argue that the BJP government has failed to ensure the safety of its citizens, and the inability to catch the terrorists responsible for the attack has raised serious questions about the effectiveness of security agencies.
The Growing Importance of Internal Security and Political Accountability
Lalu Yadav’s remarks come at a time when internal security is a central issue in Indian politics. The Pahalgam attack has sparked widespread concerns about the safety of tourists and civilians in conflict-prone areas like Jammu and Kashmir. The government’s response to such attacks has come under scrutiny, and opposition leaders like Lalu are using the issue to hold the BJP accountable for its national security policies.
Furthermore, the political debate about India’s relationship with the U.S. has gained new momentum. Critics of the Modi government argue that India’s sovereignty is at risk, with many questioning whether the government is making decisions that are in the best interest of the country or whether it is overly influenced by international pressures.
Public Reaction and Response from the Government
The public response to Lalu Yadav’s comments has been varied. While many supporters of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) have praised his bold questions, calling for a more independent foreign policy, others see it as a political attack on the ruling government without offering constructive solutions.
On the other hand, the BJP-led government has yet to respond directly to Lalu Yadav’s social media post and questions. However, the Pahalgam attack and the broader issue of India’s security are likely to dominate political debates in the coming weeks as India approaches state and national elections.
As the Pahalgam attack continues to haunt India’s national security discourse, Lalu Yadav’s statements serve as a reminder that the need for accountability and swift justice remains paramount. While the Indian government has been criticized for its handling of the attack, the diplomatic relationship with the U.S. also remains under scrutiny, with many wondering if India’s internal security and sovereignty are being compromised for the sake of international relations.
The situation is unfolding and will likely lead to further political developments. The questions raised by Lalu Yadav about the Pahalgam attack, terrorist arrests, and India’s foreign policy will continue to shape the discourse surrounding national security, foreign diplomacy, and political accountability in India.
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
